Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  4. Article
  5. Phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes reveals the need for extensive generic re-delimitation in Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae).

Phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes reveals the need for extensive generic re-delimitation in Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae).

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

PK-205-003_article-85866_en_1.pdf

Description
visibility:open
Size

4.72 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (CRC64NVME)

dbbvERE2j28=

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Ringelberg, Jens J.
ORCIDORCID logo
Koenen, Erik J. M.
ORCIDORCID logo
Iganci, João R.
ORCIDORCID logo
de Queiroz, Luciano P.
ORCIDORCID logo
Murphy, Daniel J.
ORCIDORCID logo
Gaudeul, Myriam
Bruneau, Anne
ORCIDORCID logo
Luckow, Melissa
Lewis, Gwilym P.
ORCIDORCID logo
Hughes, Colin E.
ORCIDORCID logo
Date published
August 22, 2022
Abstract
Subfamily Caesalpinioideae with ca. 4,600 species in 152 genera is the second-largest subfamily of legumes (Leguminosae) and forms an ecologically and economically important group of trees, shrubs and lianas with a pantropical distribution. Despite major advances in the last few decades towards aligning genera with clades across Caesalpinioideae, generic delimitation remains in a state of considerable flux, especially across the mimosoid clade. We test the monophyly of genera across Caesalpinioideae via phylogenomic analysis of 997 nuclear genes sequenced via targeted enrichment (Hybseq) for 420 species and 147 of the 152 genera currently recognised in the subfamily. We show that 22 genera are non-monophyletic or nested in other genera and that non-monophyly is concentrated in the mimosoid clade where ca. 25% of the 90 genera are found to be non-monophyletic. We suggest two main reasons for this pervasive generic non-monophyly: (i) extensive morphological homoplasy that we document here for a handful of important traits and, particularly, the repeated evolution of distinctive fruit types that were historically emphasised in delimiting genera and (ii) this is an artefact of the lack of pantropical taxonomic syntheses and sampling in previous phylogenies and the consequent failure to identify clades that span the Old World and New World or conversely amphi-Atlantic genera that are non-monophyletic, both of which are critical for delimiting genera across this large pantropical clade. Finally, we discuss taxon delimitation in the phylogenomic era and especially how assessing patterns of gene tree conflict can provide additional insights into generic delimitation. This new phylogenomic framework provides the foundations for a series of papers reclassifying genera that are presented here in (ALS) 14 Part 1, for establishing a new higher-level phylogenetic tribal and clade-based classification of Caesalpinioideae that is the focus of ALS14 Part 2 and for downstream analyses of evolutionary diversification and biogeography of this important group of legumes which are presented elsewhere.
Project(s)
Priority 4: Accelerated Taxonomy
Funder
Funder nameAwards
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Switzerland
310003A_156140 - 31003A_182453/1 - Early.Postdoc.Mobility fellowship P2ZHP3_199693
Claraz Schenkung Foundation, Switzerland
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canada
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia, Brazil
PTX0004 - APP0096
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brazil
480530/2012- 2 - 311847/2021-8
Journal title
PhytoKeys
Volume
205
Publisher
Pensoft Publishers
Place of publication
Sofia, Bulgaria
ISSN
1314-2011
eISSN
1314-2003
Date accepted
June 27, 2022
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.205.85866
Related URL
https://phytokeys.pensoft.net/article/85866/
Rights statement
In Copyright
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
10.3897/phytokeys.205.85866
Keywords
Morphological homoplasy
Generic delimitation
Phylogenomics
Mimosoid clade
Fabaceae
Monophyly
Caesalpinioideae
Additional information
IF = 1.635 (2021-2022). In: Hughes, C.E., Queiroz, L.P. de & Lewis, G.P. (Eds.) Advances in Legume Systematics 14. Classification of Caesalpinioideae Part 1: new generic delimitations. PhytoKeys 205 (special issue),
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify