The Genomics for Australian Plants (GAP) framework initiative – developing genomic resources for understanding the evolution and conservation of the Australian flora.
Name
SB24022.pdf
Description
visibility:open
Size
748.87 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (CRC64NVME)
GlwJ0Y9IaHE=
Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Simpson, Lalita
Cantrill, David J.
Byrne, Margaret
Allnutt, Theodore R.
King, Graham J.
Lum, Mabel
Al Bkhetan, Ziad
Andrew, Rose L.
Baker, William J.
Barrett, Matthew D.
Batley, Jacqueline
Berry, Oliver
Binks, Rachel M.
Bragg, Jason
Broadhurst, Linda
Brown, Gillian
Bruhl, Jeremy J.
Edwards, Richard J.
Ferguson, Scott
Forest, Félix
Gustafsson, Johan
Hammer, Timothy A.
Holmes, Gareth D.
Jackson, Christopher J.
James, Elizabeth A.
Jones, Ashley
Kersey, Paul J.
Leitch, Ilia J.
Maurin, Olivier
McLay, Todd G. B.
Murphy, Daniel J.
Nargar, Katharina
Nauheimer, Lars
Sauquet, Hervé
Schmidt-Lebuhn, Alexander N.
Shepherd, Kelly A.
Syme, Anna E.
Waycott, Michelle
Wilson, Trevor C.
Crayn, Darren M.
Date published
May 7, 2025
Abstract
The generation and analysis of genome-scale data – genomics – is driving a rapid increase in plant biodiversity knowledge. However, the speed and complexity of technological advance in genomics presents challenges for the widescale use of genomics in evolutionary and conservation biology. We introduce and describe a national-scale collaboration conceived to build genomic resources and capability for understanding the Australian flora: the Genomics for Australian Plants (GAP) Framework Initiative. We outline (a) the history of the project including the collaborative framework, partners and funding; (b) GAP principles such as rigour in design, sample verification and documentation, data management and data accessibility; and (c) the structure of the consortium and the four associated activity streams (reference genomes, phylogenomics, conservation genomics and training), with the rationale and aims for each of these. We show, through discussion of successes and challenges, the value of this multi-institutional consortium approach and the enablers, such as well-curated collections and national collaborative research infrastructure, all of which have led to a substantial increase in capacity and delivery of biodiversity knowledge outcomes.
Contributor (person)
Puente-Lelievre, Caroline
Project(s)
Priority 4: Accelerated Taxonomy
Priority 2: Trait Diversity and Function
Priority 1: Ecosystem Stewardship
Funder
| Funder name | Awards |
Bioplatforms Australia, Australia | |
Ian Potter Foundation, Australia | |
Royal Botanic Gardens Foundation (Victoria), Australia | |
Royal Botanic Gardens, Victoria, Australia | |
Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Australia | |
Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria, Australia | |
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia | |
Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, Australia | |
Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Australia | |
Calleva Foundation, United Kingdom | |
Journal title
Australian Systematic Botany
Volume
38
Issue
3
Publisher
CSIRO Publishing
Place of publication
Victoria, Australia
ISSN
1030-1887
eISSN
1446-5701
Date accepted
March 13, 2025
Official URL
Related URL
Rights statement
In Copyright
Additional information
IF = 1.5 (2023)