Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  4. Article
  5. WEGE: A new metric for ranking locations for biodiversity conservation

WEGE: A new metric for ranking locations for biodiversity conservation

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

ddi.13148.pdf

Description
visibility:open
Size

6.59 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (CRC64NVME)

MHXe9+yFTX4=

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Farooq, Harith
ORCIDORCID logo
Azevedo, Josué
ORCIDORCID logo
Belluardo, Francesco
ORCIDORCID logo
Nanvonamuquitxo, Cristóvão
Bennett, Dominic
ORCIDORCID logo
Moat, Justin
ORCIDORCID logo
Soares, Amadeu
ORCIDORCID logo
Faurby, Søren
ORCIDORCID logo
Antonelli, Alexandre
ORCIDORCID logo
Date published
August 26, 2020
Abstract
Aim Effective policymaking for biological conservation requires the identification and ranking of the most important areas for protection or management. One of the most frequently used systems for selecting priority areas is the Key Biodiversity Areas (hereafter KBAs), developed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). However, KBAs cannot be used to rank areas, potentially limiting their use when limited funding is available. To tackle this shortcoming and facilitate spatial prioritization, here we develop and validate the “WEGE index” (Weighted Endemism including Global Endangerment index), consisting of an adaptation of the EDGE score (Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered). WEGE allows the ranking of any set of locations according to the KBA guidelines and on a continuous scale. Location Global. Methods We calculated the EDGE score, Weighted Endemism, Evolutionary distinctiveness, Extinction risk and our newly developed WEGE index for all terrestrial species of amphibians, mammals and birds accessed by IUCN. We then compared the performance of each of those five indices at prioritizing areas according to the KBA guidelines. Results We found that for all taxa surveyed, WEGE was consistently better at identifying areas that trigger KBA status. Main conclusions In our analyses, WEGE outperformed all other methods and metrics designed for similar purposes. It can serve as a robust evidence‐based methodology to prioritize among otherwise equally qualified sites according to the KBA categories. WEGE can therefore support transparent, evidence‐based and biologically meaningful decision‐making for conservation priorities.
Funder
Funder nameAwards
Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Vetenskapsrådet
2017-03862
WCS Christensen Conservation Leaders Scholarship
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
PD/BD/128123/2016
World Wildlife Foundation - Education for Nature scholarship
35
Journal title
Diversity and Distributions
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
1366-9516
eISSN
1472-4642
Official URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13148
Rights statement
In Copyright
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
10.1111/ddi.13148
Keywords
conservation
KBAs
prioritization
policymaking
Key Biodiversity Area
WEGE
EDGE
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify