Indices Seminum: Are They Really Worth the Effort?
Name
pkpadmin_+10-39-1-CE.pdf
Description
visibility:open
Size
4.82 MB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (CRC64NVME)
Yz6bq1g+tfE=
Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Aplin, David
Linington, Simon
Rammeloo, Jan
Date published
October 31, 2007
Abstract
This manuscript investigates whether indices seminum are currently aiding conservation or whether they require modernisation. It is widely assumed that the proportion of wild-collected seeds has increased within botanical seed lists. Through a number of studies we found the reverse to be true. Our paper also found that very widespread taxa were needlessly offered from garden origin. More worrying is that taxa well known for their invasiveness were also freely available for distribution. Another concern was the failure to supply or request associated data for wild-collected seeds despite its availability, a neglect counter-intuitive to botanic gardens. We highlight that in their present form indices seminum are a waste of resources and offer little to legitimate conservation. A range of recommendations is provided for modernising this activity in order to prioritise conservation, one of our biggest challenges of the 21st century.
Journal title
Sibbaldia: the International Journal of Botanic Garden Horticulture
Issue
5
Publisher
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh
Place of publication
Edinburgh, UK
eISSN
2513-9231
Official URL
Rights statement
In Copyright