Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  4. Article
  5. Genebank Peer Reviews: A powerful tool to improve genebank quality and promote collaboration.

Genebank Peer Reviews: A powerful tool to improve genebank quality and promote collaboration.

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

280_vanHintum_etal_galley__3_.pdf

Description
visibility:open
Size

303 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (CRC64NVME)

jM3+qoAb8AM=

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Van Hintum, Theo
ORCIDORCID logo
Balding, Sharon
ORCIDORCID logo
Desheva, Gergana
ORCIDORCID logo
Dickie, John
ORCIDORCID logo
Díez, María José
ORCIDORCID logo
Guasch, Luis
ORCIDORCID logo
Hauptvogel, Pavol
ORCIDORCID logo
Holubec, Vojtěch
ORCIDORCID logo
Janovská, Dagmar
ORCIDORCID logo
Lohwasser, Ulrike
ORCIDORCID logo
Martín, Isaura
ORCIDORCID logo
Papoušková, Ludmila
ORCIDORCID logo
Schierscher-Viret, Beate
ORCIDORCID logo
Steffensen, Lise Lykke
ORCIDORCID logo
Uzundzhalieva, Katya
ORCIDORCID logo
Vaccino, Patrizia
ORCIDORCID logo
Valcárcel, José Vicente
ORCIDORCID logo
Date published
February 7, 2025
Abstract
The conservation of plant genetic resources (PGR) is critical to ensuring global food security and agricultural sustainability. Genebanks play a vital role in ex situ conservation, complementing in situ strategies by preserving crop diversity (incl. their wild relatives) and providing access to biological materials for research, breeding and farming. However, maintaining high conservation standards and ensuring accessibility remains a global challenge. To address this, the ‘Genebank Peer Review’ system was developed as a collaborative quality assessment and improvement mechanism. This system facilitates reciprocal evaluations among genebanks, promoting transparency, capacity building and continuous improvement in conservation practices. Implemented in Europe since 2019, the peer review process involves structured self-assessments, site visits and expert evaluations, culminating in publicly available reports that guide genebanks in enhancing their operations. Feedback from participating institutions highlights the system's effectiveness in fostering knowledge exchange, strengthening professional networks and improving genebank management practices. Despite its success, challenges remain, particularly regarding expert availability and resource constraints. Future efforts should focus on institutionalizing mentorship programmes to sustain and expand the impact of Genebank Peer Reviews and monitor improvements.
Journal title
Genetic Resources
Publisher
Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
eISSN
2708-3764
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.oadz7911
Related URL
https://www.genresj.org/index.php/grj/article/view/genresj.OADZ7911
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
10.46265/genresj.oadz7911
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify