Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  4. Article
  5. On the identity of Dracocephalum breviflorum (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae).

On the identity of Dracocephalum breviflorum (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae).

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Zhang, Rong-Qing
ORCIDORCID logo
Paton, Alan J.
ORCIDORCID logo
Chen, Ya-Ping
ORCIDORCID logo
Xiang, Chun-Lei
ORCIDORCID logo
Date published
February 1, 2024
Abstract
As currently circumscribed, the genus Dracocephalum Linnaeus (1753: 594) includes the traditionally defined Hyssopus Linnaeus (1753: 569) and Lallemantia Fischer & Meyer (1840: 52), making it the second largest genus in subtribe Nepetinae (Nepetoideae, Lamiaceae), consisting of ca. 80 species (Chen et al. 2022). Morphologically, the genus is most similar to Nepeta Linnaeus (1753: 570), but it can be easily distinguished from the latter by its calyces with a thickened sinus-like fold between the bases of adjacent calyx lobes (Li & Hedge 1994; Harley et al. 2004). There are approximately 40 species of Dracocephalum distributed in China, of which 19 are endemic (Li & Hedge 1994; Chen et al. 2021, 2022). Among those endemic species, Dracocephalum breviflorum Turrill (1922: 154) was described on the basis of a specimen collected from Mount Everest area, southern Xizang (Tibet), China (A.F.R. Wollaston 255, K000911317). In the protologue, Turrill (1922) thought D. breviflorum is most similar to D. heterophyllum Bentham (1835: 738) but emphasized that the calyx morphology of the species (i.e., remarkably short and more distinctly 2-lipped than any previously known species of Dracocephalum) is unique in Dracocephalum. During our taxonomic revision of Dracocephalum in the Pan-Himalayan region, we found that D. breviflorum does not have a thickened sinus-like fold between the base of the calyx lobes, indicating it should be a member of the genus Nepeta. Given the importance of types in solving taxonomical issues (Wagensommer et al. 2016; Akhil et al. 2022; Perrino et al. 2023), we carefully compared the type specimens of both D. breviflorum and Nepeta coerulescens Maximowicz (1881: 529) (Fig. 1). In addition, we carried out observations of plants in the field (Fig. 2). The results of our research on herbarium specimens and in the field demonstrated that D. breviflorum and N. coerulescens are conspecific, and here we synonymize Dracocephalum breviflorum under Nepeta coerulescens.
Project(s)
Collections
Priority 4: Accelerated Taxonomy
Funder
Funder nameAwards
Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program, China
(No. 2022FY202200)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China
(31800168)
Survey of Wildlife Resources in Key Areas of Tibet, China
(ZL202203601)
Journal title
Phytotaxa
Volume
636
Issue
1
Publisher
Magnolia Press
Place of publication
Auckland, N.Z.
ISSN
1179-3155
eISSN
1179-3163
Date accepted
January 24, 2024
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.636.1.10
Related URL
https://phytotaxa.mapress.com/pt/article/view/phytotaxa.636.1.10
Rights statement
In Copyright
DOI
10.11646/phytotaxa.636.1.10
Keywords
Nomenclature
Geographical distribution
China
Descriptors
Dracocephalum breviflorum
Nepeta coerulescens
Phenology
Identification
Additional information
IF = 1.05 (2022-2023)
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify