Crowdsourcing, is it a good option for your collection digitization?
Name
BISS_article_25410.pdf
Description
visibility:open
Size
40.96 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (CRC64NVME)
4Uu7J2CpMFU=
Resource type
Abstract
Date published
May 21, 2018
Abstract
Globally there are a number of citizen science portals to support digitisation of biodiversity collections. Digitisation not only involves imaging of the specimen itself, but also includes the digital transcription of label and ledger data, georeferencing and linking to other digital resources. Making use of the skills and enthusiasm of volunteers is potentially a good way to reduce the great backlog of specimens to be digitised.
These citizen science portals engage the public and are liberating data that would otherwise remain on paper. There is also considerable scope for expansion into other countries and languages. Therefore, should we continue to expand? Volunteers give their time for free, but the creation and maintenance of the platform is not without costs. Given a finite budget, what can you get for your money? How does the quality compare with other methods? Is crowdsourcing of label transcription faster, better and cheaper than other forms of transcription system?
We will summarize the use of volunteer transcription from our own experience and the reports of other projects. We will make our evaluation based on the costs, speed and quality of the systems and reach conclusions on why you should or should not use this method.
Funder
| Funder name | Awards |
Horizon 2020, European Union | H2020-INFRADEV-2017-1 grant agreement 777483, ICEDIG: Innovation and Consolidation for large-scale Digitisation of natural heritage |
Event title
TDWG 2018
Volume
2
Publisher
Pensoft Publishers
Place of publication
Sofia, Bulgaria
eISSN
2535-0897
Official URL
Rights statement
In Copyright