Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  4. Article
  5. Conservation gap analysis for Erica (Ericaceae).

Conservation gap analysis for Erica (Ericaceae).

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

NC-63-199_article-175466_en_1.pdf

Description
visibility:open
Size

10.68 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (CRC64NVME)

f4d5L0yJFnI=

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Pirie, Michael D.
ORCIDORCID logo
Bester, Stoffel P.
ORCIDORCID logo
Blackhall-Miles, Robbie
ORCIDORCID logo
Coetzee, Anina
ORCIDORCID logo
Crowley, Dan
ORCIDORCID logo
Ebrahim, Ismail
ORCIDORCID logo
Elliott, Alan C.
ORCIDORCID logo
Fagúndez, Jaime
ORCIDORCID logo
Forest, Félix
ORCIDORCID logo
Forshaw, Nigel
ORCIDORCID logo
Hoekstra, Rendert D.
ORCIDORCID logo
Kandziora, Martha
ORCIDORCID logo
Klopper, Ronell R.
ORCIDORCID logo
Koopman, Rupert
Musker, Seth D.
ORCIDORCID logo
Nürk, Nicolai M.
ORCIDORCID logo
Osborne, Jo
ORCIDORCID logo
Pasta, Salvatore
ORCIDORCID logo
Pipins, Sebastian
ORCIDORCID logo
Quintana, Itxaso
ORCIDORCID logo
Rebelo, Anthony G.
ORCIDORCID logo
Rees, Paul
ORCIDORCID logo
Rohrauer, Daniel
le Roux, M. Marianne
ORCIDORCID logo
Smit, Martin
Wilman, Victoria
Date published
April 6, 2026
Abstract
The flowering plant genus Erica (Ericaceae) includes well over 800 species and numerous formally described subspecies and varieties. Many of these are threatened in the wild. The Global Conservation Consortium (GCC) for Erica was established under Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) in order to collaboratively prevent species extinctions. To target this work, we need fundamental information on species distributions, conservation status in the wild, and representation in ex situ collections. In large, complex groups like Erica, such data are not necessarily available or easily accessible. Here, we document the current state of ex situ and in situ conservation of threatened Erica species, identify knowledge and resource gaps, and set out priorities for future work. We further developed and consolidated the large body of data on Erica nomenclature, taxonomy, and diversity now openly accessible as a result of collaborative efforts, in particular through the World Flora Online (WFO), the e-Flora of South Africa, and contributors to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). We obtained accessions data for living plant collections from BGCI’s PlantSearch and from botanic gardens directly, and wild distribution data from GBIF. We linked and summarised data in an updated version (4.03) of the openly available Erica Identification Aid to assist in prioritising work. Through discussions in thematic working groups of GCC Erica we identified further priorities for conservation action. The volume of openly available, georeferenced records for species has increased dramatically in recent years. Although fewer than half of threatened Erica taxa are in ex situ conservation collections, many more botanic gardens hold African/Cape species and could contribute to distributed meta-collections. The most urgent research gaps include undescribed and poorly understood diversity (particularly in South Africa and Madagascar) and shortfalls in up-to-date threat assessments. Between ex situ sites we need to establish accession-level comparisons of data and sharing of conservation grade material. We must improve knowledge of seed longevity and techniques for effective cultivation. We should secure species and collect data through collaboration with landowners and the public. Priority action in situ should include clearance of invasive alien plants as well as habitat restoration and reintroduction. Key statistics for Erica species: 1) Total: 830 species (excluding hybrids; plus 364 subspecies and varieties). South Africa: 747 species; Madagascar/Mascarenes: 41; Tropical Africa: 25; Europe/Mediterranean: 21. 2) 45% species revised taxonomically since 1965. 3) 77% species recorded on GBIF in the last 10 years. 4) 90% species threat assessed (38% in the last 10 years). 5) 46 Critically Endangered (CR), 48 Endangered (EN), 95 Vulnerable (VU) (23% threatened). 6) 47% of threatened species in ex situ collections.
Project(s)
Priority 5: Enhanced Partnerships
Priority 1: Ecosystem Stewardship
Funder
Funder nameAwards
Olaf Grolle Olsens legat til Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
Journal title
Nature Conservation
Volume
63
Publisher
Pensoft Publishers
Place of publication
Sofia, Bulgaria
ISSN
1314-6947
eISSN
1314-3301
Date accepted
February 20, 2026
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.63.175466
Related URL
https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/article/175466/
Rights statement
In Copyright
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
10.3897/natureconservation.63.175466
Keywords
Taxonomy
Botanic gardens
Conservation
Ericaceae
Erica
Conservation gap analysis
Threat status
Additional information
IF = 1.7 (2024)
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify