Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
  4. Article
  5. Nitrogen-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing legume plants differ in leaf nutrient concentrations and relationships between photosynthetic and hydraulic traits.

Nitrogen-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing legume plants differ in leaf nutrient concentrations and relationships between photosynthetic and hydraulic traits.

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Xiao, Yan
ORCIDORCID logo
Yang, Da
Zhang, Shu-Bin
ORCIDORCID logo
Mo, Yu-Xuan
ORCIDORCID logo
Dong, Yi-Yi
Wang, Ke-Fei
He, Ling-Yun
Dong, Bing
ORCIDORCID logo
Dossa, Gbadamassi G. O.
ORCIDORCID logo
Zhang, Jiao-Lin
ORCIDORCID logo
Date published
May 1, 2024
Abstract
Legumes account for a significant proportion of plants in the terrestrial ecosystems. Nitrogen-fixing capability of certain legumes is a pivotal trait that contributes to their ecological dominance. Yet, the functional traits and trait relationships between N-fixer and non-N-fixer legumes are poorly understood. Here, we investigated 27 functional traits associated with morphology, nutrients, hydraulic conductance, and photosynthesis in 42 woody legumes (19 N-fixers and 23 non-N-fixers) in a common garden. Our results showed that N-fixers had higher specific leaf area, photosynthetic phosphorus (P) use efficiency, leaf nitrogen (N) and iron concentrations on both area and mass basis, N/P ratio, and carbon (C) to P ratio, but lower wood density, area-based maximum photosynthetic rate (Aa), photosynthetic N use efficiency, leaf mass- and area-based P and molybdenum and area-based boron concentrations, and C/N ratio, compared to non-N-fixers. The mass-based maximum photosynthetic rate (Am), stomatal conductance (gs), intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi), mass- and area-based leaf potassium and mass-based boron concentrations, leaf hydraulic conductance (Kleaf), and whole-shoot hydraulic conductance (Kshoot) showed no difference between N-fixers and non-N-fixers. Significant positive associations between all hydraulic and photosynthetic trait pairs were found in N-fixers, but only one pair (Kshoot-Aa) in non-N-fixers, suggesting that hydraulic conductance plays a more important role in mediating photosynthetic capacity in N-fixers compared to non-N-fixers. Higher mass-based leaf N was linked to lower time-integrated gs and higher WUEi among non-N-fixer legumes or all legumes pooled after phylogeny was considered. Moreover, mass-based P concentration was positively related to Am and gs in N-fixers, but not in non-N-fixers, indicating that the photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance in N-fixers were more dependent on leaf P status than in non-N-fixers. These findings expand our understanding of the trait-based ecology within and across N-fixer and non-N-fixer legumes in tropics.
Project(s)
Priority 2: Trait Diversity and Function
Journal title
Tree Physiology
Article number
tpae048
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Place of publication
Oxford, UK
ISSN
0829-318X
eISSN
1758-4469
Date accepted
April 30, 2024
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpae048
Rights statement
In Copyright
DOI
10.1093/treephys/tpae048
Keywords
Legumes
Non-nitrogen-fixing legume plants
Photosynthetic traits
Leaf nutrient concentrations
Nitrogen-fixing legume plants
Hydraulic traits
Additional information
IF = 4.561 (2023-2024)
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify